Organization
Organization Name: PeopleTec, Inc.
Organizational Unit: Groups A, C, and D
Appraisal Sponsor Name: Dana Tanner
Lead Appraiser Name: Jeffrey Dutton
Partner Name: Breakpoint Consulting Group

Organizational Unit Description
Basic Units / Support Functions:
PEELS – Parametric Endo/Exo Atmospheric Lethality Simulation
    Huntsville, Alabama United States
Measurement and Analysis
    Huntsville, Alabama United States
Process Management
    Huntsville, Alabama United States
Training
    Huntsville, Alabama United States
EFSMS – Electronic Flight Strip Mgt. System
    Huntsville, Alabama United States
TAIS – SM2 - Tactical Airspace Integration System (TAIS) System Modification (SM-2)
    Huntsville, Alabama United States
Quality Assurance
    Hunsville, Alabama United States
Configuration Management
    Huntsville, Alabama United States

Organizational Sample Size
% of people included: 100
% of projects/units included: 100
Org Scope Description: EFSMS – Electronic Flight Strip Mgt. System [Group A], TAIS – SM2 - Tactical Airspace Integration System (TAIS) System Modification (SM-2) [Group C], and PEELS – Parametric Endo/Exo Atmospheric Lethality Simulation [Group D].

Appraisal Description
Last Day of Appraisal Onsite: Apr 29, 2016
Appraisal Expiration Date: Apr 29, 2019
Appraisal Method Used: SCAMPI V1.3 A
Model Information: CMMI-DEV v1.3
Sampling Summary
Sampling Factors: Location (Not Relevant: Location is not relevant because all projects are located in Huntsville, Al.)

Customer: Customers who impose strict process requirements may well cause the implementation of the standard process to not be compliant with the CMMI.

Size (Not Relevant: All projects are roughly the same size)

Organizational Structure (Not Relevant: Although projects report to different Groups, the Groups share common process goals, and a common process improvement organization.)

Type of Work: Whether a project is a hardware or software project affects the application of the standard processes, as the engineering business processes are tailorable for software vs. hardware.

Sampling Factor Values: Customer does not impose non-compliant guidelines. (Customer): Customer does not impose development practices which cause non-compliance with the CMMI.

Customer imposes non-compliant guidelines. (Customer): Customer imposes development practices which cause non-compliance with the CMMI.

Hardware Development (Type of Work): Requirements, design, and integration of hardware components.

Lean Software Development (Type of Work): Development of software in accordance with lean development practices.

Subgroups:
Hardware Development: None.
5 People, 1 Basic Units
- Customer does not impose non-compliant guidelines.
- Hardware Development

Lean Software Development: Software developed IAW lean practices.
12 People, 2 Basic Units
- Lean Software Development
- Customer does not impose non-compliant guidelines.

Model Scope and Appraisal Ratings
CMMI-DEV v1.3
Process Management Project Management Engineering Support
OPF
OPD
OT
OPP
OPM
PP
PMC
SAM
IPM
RSKM
QPM
REQM
RD
TS
PI
VER
VAL
CM
PPQA
MA
DAR
CAR
Maturity Level:Maturity Level 3