Organization
Organization Name: AEGIS.net, Inc.
Organizational Unit: Engineering, Development, Systems and Services
Appraisal Sponsor Name: Michael Callihan
Lead Appraiser Name: Richard Bechtold
Partner Name: Abridge Technology

Organizational Unit Description
Basic Units / Support Functions:
BU01, ValueOptions
    Rockville, MD United States
BU03, University of Maryland University College
    Washington, DC United States
BU05, NRC FSME/NMSS
    Washington, DC United States
BU07, NRC Office of Inspector General (OIG) ADAMS Assessment
    Washington, DC United States
SF02, Purchasing (SAM) unit
    Rockville, MD United States
SF04, Quality Assurance
    Rockville, MD United States
BU02, Developers Integration Lab (DIL)
    Rockville, MD United States
BU04, NRC E-Gov Travel System (ETS2) Testing
    Washington, DC United States
BU06, NRC Reactor Program System (RPS)
    Washington, DC United States
SF01, Process Improvement Initiatives
    Rockville, MD United States
SF03, Infrastructure Support Services
    Rockville, MD United States

Organizational Sample Size
% of people included: 87
% of projects/units included: 41
Org Scope Description: Of the 17 current AEGIS.net projects, seven have been sampled for this appraisal.

Appraisal Description
Last Day of Appraisal Onsite: Oct 16, 2015
Appraisal Expiration Date: Oct 16, 2018
Appraisal Method Used: SCAMPI V1.3 A
Model Information: CMMI-DEV v1.3
CMMI-SVC+SSD v1.3
Sampling Summary
Sampling Factors: Location (Not Relevant: [No] Some projects and services are occurring locally, such as at a primary office location, or are managed by primary office location personnel. Others are occurring in the field and are being managed primarily by field personnel. However, this does not have a notable distinguishing effect on process implementation and performance.)

Customer (Not Relevant: [No] Although each customer tends to have its own preferences relating to details such as progress report formats, information, and frequency, the customer does not have a significant influence on how processes are implemented or performed within the organizational unit.)

Size (Not Relevant: [No] Generally, process performance is consistent, and does not vary significantly due to size.)

Organizational Structure (Not Relevant: [No] The organizational unit has a relatively flat management structure. Therefore organizational structure does not cause significant variations in the performance of processes.)

Type of Work: [YES] The organization has two major different types of projects and/or basic units, hence the type of work does significantly affect how processes are performed.

Sampling Factor Values: Development-Intensive (Type of Work): Projects are categorized as development intensive when the majority of effort is focused on software or other product development.

Service-Intensive (Type of Work): Projects are categorized as service intensive when their primary purpose is to deliver services and provide support to clients and end-users.

Subgroups:
Development Intensive: AEGIS’ Design and Development projects supporting external clients
22 People, 3 Basic Units
- Development-Intensive

Service Intensive: AEGIS’ services projects and internal support functions supporting external clients
38 People, 14 Basic Units
- Service-Intensive

Model Scope and Appraisal Ratings
CMMI-DEV v1.3
Process Management Project Management Engineering Support
OPF
OPD
OT
OPP
OPM
PP
PMC
SAM
IPM
RSKM
QPM
REQM
RD
TS
PI
VER
VAL
CM
PPQA
MA
DAR
CAR
Maturity Level:Maturity Level 3

CMMI-SVC+SSD v1.3
Process Management Project Management Support Service Establishment and Delivery
OPD
OPF
OT
OPP
OPM
WP
WMC
REQM
SAM
CAM
IWM
RSKM
SCON
QWM
CM
MA
PPQA
DAR
CAR
SD
IRP
SSD
SST
STSM
Maturity Level:Maturity Level 3