Organization
Organization Name: Raytheon
Organizational Unit: Space and Airborne Systems (SAS) Hardware and Software New Development
Appraisal Sponsor Name: Robert Gonzalez , Robert Wright
Lead Appraiser Name: Robert Moore
Partner Name: Business Transformation Institute, Inc.

Organizational Unit Description
Basic Units / Support Functions:
**Sensitive**
    Los Angeles, California United States
    Greensboro, North Carolina United States
SAS Engineering Excellence & Operations
    Los Angeles, California United States
    Dallas, Texas United States
    Marlborough, Massachussets United States
    Fort Wayne, Indiana United States
SAS Engineering Learning & University Relations
    Dallas, Texas United States
    Los Angeles, Calinfornia United States
**Sensitive**
    Dallas, Texas United States
**Sensitive**
    Fort Wayne, Indiana United States
SIS Process Group
    Los Angeles, California United States

Organizational Sample Size
% of people included: 37
% of projects/units included: 75
Org Scope Description: Classic SAS programs (RSS program), new SAS programs (EWPMT program), SIS programs (ESS program), and SAS and SIS support groups.

Appraisal Description
Last Day of Appraisal Onsite: Aug 02, 2017
Appraisal Expiration Date: Aug 02, 2020
Appraisal Method Used: SCAMPI V1.3 A
Model Information: CMMI-DEV v1.3
Sampling Summary
Sampling Factors: Location (Not Relevant: All locations where Raytheon performs new product development were sampled using Design of Experiments (DoE) methods and no differences in process implementation were found based on location.)

Customer (Not Relevant: Programs serving all of Raytheon's customers where Raytheon performs new product development were sampled using Design of Experiments (DoE) methods and no differences in process implementation were found based on customer.)

Size (Not Relevant: All program sizes for programs where Raytheon performs new product development were sampled using Design of Experiments (DoE) methods and no differences in process implementation were found based on program size.)

Organizational Structure: A program's originating business unit prior to Raytheon internal re-organization was found to influence process implementation based on sampling using Design of Experiments (DoE) methods.

Type of Work (Not Relevant: All types of work (technology domains) where Raytheon performs new product development were sampled using Design of Experiments (DoE) methods and no differences in process implementation were found based on type of work.)

Sampling Factor Values: Classic SAS Programs (Organizational Structure): Programs managed by SAS prior to internal reorganization of the Raytheon Company

New SAS Programs (Organizational Structure): Programs managed by another Raytheon business unit (Network Centric Systems or Integrated Defense Systems) prior to internal reorganization of the Raytheon Company

SIS Programs (Organizational Structure): Programs managed by companies acquired by Raytheon SAS

Subgroups:
Classic SAS: Raytheon SAS Engineering hardware and software product development programs that were managed by SAS prior to internal reorganization of the Raytheon Company
200 People, 2 Basic Units
- Classic SAS Programs

New SAS: Raytheon SAS Engineering hardware and software product development programs that were managed by another Raytheon business unit prior to internal reorganization of the Raytheon Company
27 People, 1 Basic Units
- New SAS Programs

SIS: Raytheon Engineering software product development programs that were managed by SIS prior to acquisition
45 People, 1 Basic Units
- SIS Programs

Model Scope and Appraisal Ratings
CMMI-DEV v1.3
Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
REQM
PP
PMC
SAM
MA
PPQA
CM
RD
TS
PI
VER
VAL
OPF
OPD
OT
IPM
RSKM
DAR
OPP
QPM
OPM
CAR
Maturity Level:Maturity Level 5